CO129-060 - Public Offices - 1856 — Page 158

CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案 All AI Reviewed

and obligations of those on board; and that to the extent of the exercise of this jurisdiction they are part of the Territory of the Nation itself.

are considered

With respect to this pretension to exemption from the local jurisdiction in respect of offences committed on board American Vessels within a British Port, which is thus avowed by Officers of the U.S.; H.M's Govt are entirely of opinion that no such exemption exists either by the Law or comity of nations. The doctrine advanced by Mr Webster is applied by him only to the case of ships forced by necessity into a Foreign Port. In the case of

Grading

a

156

-trading Vessels in a foreign Port it is admitted (see Kent's Commentaries, p.157, note) that the offences committed on board of them may be considered as committed in the Territory of the state to which they belong.

to give the Tribunals of that state jurisdiction,

as to

so as

Yet the local Tribunals have at all events a concurrent jurisdiction. It appears to H.M's Govt that though it may be conceded that foreign ships coming into the Port of another Country bring with her the Laws of her country as the measure of the Rights, Duties & obligations of those who belong to her, yet there can be no question that every Foreigner

Edit History

2026-05-18 07:40:57 · NVIDIA / meta/llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct
Live
View comparison
AI Proofread
and obligations of those on board; and that to the extent of the exercise of this jurisdiction they are part of the Territory of the Nation itself. are considered With respect to this pretension to exemption from the local jurisdiction in respect of offences committed on board American Vessels within a British Port, which is thus avowed by Officers of the U.S.; H.M's Govt are entirely of opinion that no such exemption exists either by the Law or comity of nations. The doctrine advanced by Mr Webster is applied by him only to the case of ships forced by necessity into a Foreign Port. In the case of Grading a 156 -trading Vessels in a foreign Port it is admitted (see Kent's Commentaries, p.157, note) that the offences committed on board of them may be considered as committed in the Territory of the state to which they belong. to give the Tribunals of that state jurisdiction, as to so as Yet the local Tribunals have at all events a concurrent jurisdiction. It appears to H.M's Govt that though it may be conceded that foreign ships coming into the Port of another Country bring with her the Laws of her country as the measure of the Rights, Duties & obligations of those who belong to her, yet there can be no question that every Foreigner
Baseline (Original)
and obigations of thou on board; and that to the extent of the exercise of this porisdiction they is port of the Territory of the Nation itself. are considered With respect to this pretention to exemption from the loss joonischiation in lerk of offences committed on Foard American Vessels within a British Port, which is thus avvorted by Officers of the U. J.; H. M's Gout are entirely of opinion that no tuck exemption existo either by the Law or comity of nations. The dostrine advanced by Mr Hebster is applied by him only to the case of thiss forced by neceintz into a Foreign Port. In the case of Grading a 156 -trading Deculs in a foreign Port it is admitted (see 10 cents commentaries, p.157, note () that the offences committed on board of them, mony be considered as committed in the Territory of the state to which they belong. to give the Tribunals of that state pronodiction, as to so as Zet the local Tribunals have at all events a concurrent girisdiction . It appears to H. M's Goot that though it may be coneeded that foreign this coming into the Port of another Country Bungo with her the Laws of her country as the measme of the Rights, Duties & obligations of those who belong to her, get them can be no question that every Foreigner www ! I
2026-05-18 07:40:57 · Baseline
View content

and obigations of thou on board; and that to the extent of the exercise of this porisdiction they is port of the Territory of the Nation itself.

are considered

With respect to this pretention to exemption from the loss joonischiation in lerk of offences committed on Foard American Vessels within a British Port, which is thus avvorted by Officers of the U. J.; H. M's Gout are entirely of opinion that no tuck exemption existo either by the Law or comity of nations. The dostrine advanced by Mr Hebster is applied by him only to the case of thiss forced by neceintz into a Foreign Port. In the case of

Grading

a

156

-trading Deculs in a foreign Port it is admitted (see 10 cents commentaries, p.157, note () that the offences committed on board of them, mony be considered as committed in the Territory of the state to which they belong.

to give the Tribunals of that state pronodiction,

as to

so as

Zet the local Tribunals have at all events a concurrent girisdiction . It appears to H. M's Goot that though it may be coneeded that foreign this coming into the Port of another Country Bungo with her the Laws of her country as the measme of the Rights, Duties & obligations of those who belong to her, get them can be no question that every Foreigner

www

!

I

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.